SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 53042

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE K. SUJANA
D.Sathaiah Ramalkolu Sathaiah – Appellant
Versus
R. Pentaiah – Respondent


THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE K. SUJANA I.A.No.1 to 3 of 2023, I.A.No.1 to 6 of 2025 In/And

COMMON ORDER:

Heard Sri N. Saida Rao, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellants/petitioners as well as Sri Chalakani Venkata Yadav, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents.

2. Challenging the judgment and decree dated 9.11.2003 passed in O.S.No.626 of 1996 by the learned II Additional Senior Civil Judge, R.R. District at L.B. Nagar, Hyderabad, the present Appeal Suit is filed.

3. I.A.Nos.1 to 3 of 2023 have been filed by the legal representatives of respondent No.9 in the appeal suit seeking (i) condonation of delay of 4197 days in filing the application to bring them on record as legal representatives, (ii) setting aside the abatement that occurred due to the death of respondent No.9, and (iii) impleading them as parties in the appeal.

3.1 Learned counsel for the petitioners in I.A.Nos.1 to 3 submitted that respondent Nos.1 to 3 had instituted O.S.No.626 of 1996 before the learned II Additional Senior Civil Judge, Ranga Reddy District, L.B. Nagar, Hyderabad, against respondent Nos.5 to 10, seeking partition of the plaint schedule properties and allotment of their respe

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top