THE HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR JUKANTI CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL Nos.449 OF 2005 and

570 OF 2008

COMMON JUDGMENT:

Aggrieved by order, dated 11.03.2005, in W.C.No.2 of

2004 passed by the Commissioner for Workmen’s Compensation and Assistant Commissioner of Labour, Karimnagar, the Insurance Company/appellant filed CMA.No.449 of 2005.

2. Aggrieved by order, dated 11.03.2005, in W.C.No.2 of 2004 passed by the Commissioner for Workmen’s Compensation and Assistant Commissioner of Labour, Karimnagar, the claimant/appellant filed CMA.No.570 of

2008.

3. CMA.Nos.449 of 2005 and 570 of 2008 arise out of the same order, they are being heard together and disposed of by this common judgment.

4. For convenience, facts in CMA.No.449 of 2005 are discussed.

5. Heard Mr. M. Satish Reddy, learned counsel representing Mr. Naresh Byrapaneni, learned counsel for appellant/Insurance Company and Mr. V. Rohith, learned counsel representing Mr. V. Kiran Rao, learned counsel appearing for respondents.

6. Claimant/applicant (appellant in CMA.No.570 of 2008 and respondent No.1 in CMA.No.449 of 2005) claims that he’s working as salesman cum auto driver for Vijayasri Enterprises. Respondent No.2 (in CMA.No.449 of 20