SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 53301

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA
Mallan Goud – Appellant
Versus
The Commissioner of Prohibition and Excise – Respondent


HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA WRIT PETITION No. 8408 OF 2020

O R D E R:

Heard Sri P. Venkata Subbarao, learned counsel for petitioners and learned Government Pleader for Prohibition &

Excise for respondents.

2. This Writ Petition is filed by petitioners questioning the proceedings of Respondent No.1 vide Cr.NO.02/2018/CPE/B2 dated: 28-01-2020, and consequential proceedings of Respondent No.2 vide Proc Rc.No.A2/89/2014 dated: 08-06-2020.

3. It the case of Petitioners that they were initially appointed as A.P.S.P. Constable. Thereafter, they were deputed to work in Prohibition and Excise Department and were subsequently absorbed as Prohibition and Excise Constables based on G.O.Ms. No. 1103 Revenue (Exercise-1) Department dated 17-08-2007. Petitioners submitted their respective willingness for absorption as a Prohibition and Excise Constable and after his deputation on the strength of the order of the commissioner of Prohibition and Excise, and after obtaining options and willingness from Petitioners that they would abide by the seniority list. Petitioners were appropriately included in the seniority list for promotion to the post of Head Constable, based on the existing seniori

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top