HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA A.S.No. 444 OF 2011

J U D G M E N T:

Against the judgment and decree dated 30-05-2022 in O.S.No. 22 of 2008 on the file of the Judge, Family Court- cum- Additional District Court at Mahabunagar, this Appeal is filed.

2. Respondents in the Appeal are Plaintiffs in the mentioned suit. Relief sought in the said suit is partition and separate possession of 1/4^th share of plaint schedule 1 to 11 properties.

3. The parties in the present Appeal are being referred to as arrayed in the suit.

4. Before the Court below, on behalf of Plaintiffs, two witnesses were examined i.e. PW-1, who is Plaintiff No. 1 and PW-2 who is Plaintiff No. 2 and Exs. A1 to 17 were marked. On behalf of defendants, Exs. B1 to B5 were marked, Defendant No. 1 was examined as DW-1 and Defendant No. 14 was examined as DW-2 and Defendant No. 2 was examined as DW-3 and three independent witnesses were examined as DW-4 – Mahabub Ali, DW-5-M. Ramulu and DW-6-Bala Kistaiah.

5. The case of Plaintiffs is that, Late Bazaru Pedda Balaiah, Chinna Balaiah, Late Yenkappa and Chinna Venkappa are all sons of Late Bazaru Ramaiah and were the joint owners of Plaint Schedule Property. They all were havi