SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 53419

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J SREENIVAS RAO
Edupuganti Sathyanarayana Murthy – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent
WP 15167/2025



THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J. SREENIVAS RAO WRIT PETITION No.15167 OF 2025

ORDER:

This writ petition has been filed seeking the following relief:

“to issue a Writ Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in trying to dispossess the petitioners from their agriculture land property situated in Sy.No.131 to an extent of Ac.1.00 gts along with house bearing H.No.1-1-77 of Manuguru Village and Mandal, Bhadradri Kothagudem District without passing orders by the 2nd respondent either in the main Appeal or in stay petition filed by the petitioners on 07/05/2025 against the orders passed by the 3rd respondent/Special Deputy Collector in LTR Case No.10/2023/MGR, dtd.28/12/2024 which is served on the counsel for petitioners on 22/04/2025 in connection with the petitioner s agricultural land situated in Sy.No.131 to an extent of Ac.1.00 of Manuguru Village and Mandal, Bhadradri Kothagudem District is illegal and void and opposed to Articles 14, 19, 21 and 300A of Constitution of India and consequently to direct the respondent/authorities not dispossess the petitioners from their land situated in Sy.No.131 to an extent of Ac.1.00 of Manuguru Village and Mandal, Bhadradri Kothagudem District till disposal of the main appeal filed by the petitioners before the 2nd respondent on 07/05/2025 against the orders of the 3rd respondent dtd.28/12/2024 served on the petitioners counsel on 22/04/2025.”

2. Heard Mr.M.Srinivasa Rao, learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Government Pleader for Tribal Welfare Department appearing for respondent Nos.1 to 3 and learned Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for respondent No.4.

3. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the writ petition is being disposed of at the stage of admission.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are seeking disposal of the stay application or appeal pending before respondent No.2 and till such time, to protect their possession. In view of the same, notice in respect of respondent Nos.5 and 6 is dispensed with.

5.1. Facts giving rise to filing of this writ petition briefly stated are that the petitioners claim to be the owners and possessors of agricultural land admeasuring Ac.1-00 in Sy.No.131, along with a house bearing Door No.1-1-77 situated in Sy.No.131 over an extent of Ac.0-20 cents. They stated that the said property was purchased from the original owner through a sada sale deed dated 07.05.1997. Additionally, the petitioners also purchased Ac.0-20 cents in Sy.No.129 and Ac.1-04 guntas in Sy.No.130 under a registered sale deed dated 29.12.1991 by paying valuable sale consideration. Since then, the petitioners have been in peaceful possession and enjoyment of the aforesaid properties.

5.2. It is further averred that the vendors of the petitioners had acquired the above mentioned lands through a registered sale deed dated 27.06.1985. The petitioners also stated that they constructed a house in a portion of the land measuring Ac.0-25 cents in Sy.No.131, and the Gram Panchayat has allotted Door No.1-1-77 in their favour.

5.3. It is further averred that respondent Nos.5 and 6 claimed to be the legal heirs of one Bandaru Mandaiah @ Mangaiah. The brother of Bandaru Mandaiah @ Mangaiah i.e., Bandaru Narasimha, submitted application to the Special Deputy Collector/respondent No.3 and basing on the same, respondent No.3 initiated the proceedings vide LTR Case No.10/2023/MGR and passed eviction order on 28.12.2024 exercising the powers conferred under the provisions of the Telangana Schedule Areas Land Transfer Rules, 1969 read with sub-section 2(a) of Section (3) of Regulation 1959 and ordered the ejectment of petitioner from the subject land to an extent of Ac.1-00 in Sy.No.131 of Manuguru Village and Mandal and directed respondent No.4 to resume the above said property to Government custody. Aggrieved by the above said order, the petitioner filed statutory appeal

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top