SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 53476

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY,THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA
Sri M.R.Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Ch Ramesh – Respondent


THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE P.SAM KOSHY AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE NARSI NG RAO NANDI KONDA CONTEMPT APPEAL Nos.17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33 and 34 of 2023

COMMON JUDGMENT

(per the Hon’ble Sri Justice P.Sam Koshy)

Since the issue arising in the instant appeals is one and the same, they are taken up for analogous hearing and are decided by way of this common judgment.

2. Heard Mr. Pratap Narayan Sanghi, learned Senior Counsel representing Mr. Avadesh Narayan Sanghi and Bathula Raj Kiran, learned counsel for the appellants, and Mr. M. Surender Rao, learned Senior Counsel representing Mr. Aka Venkataramana, learned counsel for the respondents.

3. The instant appeals are filed under Section 19 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act’). The challenge is to the common order dated 13.10.2023 passed by the Hon’ble Single Bench of this High Court in a batch of contempt cases decided analogously; lead case being C.C.No.1530 of 2019.

4. Vide the impugned common order, the Hon’ble Single Bench while hearing the batch of contempt petitions has held that the appellants herein have been found guilty of contempt and are liable to be

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top