IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE RENUKA YARA,THE HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE SUJOY PAUL
M/s. Tata Lockheed Martin Aerostructures Ltd – Appellant
Versus
The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner-II – Respondent
THE HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE SUJOY PAUL AND THE HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE RENUKA YARA WRIT APPEAL No.530 of 2025 JUDGMENT: (Per the Hon’ble the Acting Chief Justice Sujoy Paul)
Sri G.Vidya Sagar, learned Senior Counsel appearing for Ms.Shireen Sethna Baria, learned counsel for the appellant and Sri Dasagari Raghavendar Rao, learned Standing Counsel for respondent No.1.
2. Heard on admission.
3. This intra Court appeals takes exception to an interlocutory order/interim order passed by the learned Single Judge in I.A.No.2 of 2025 in W.P.No.10385 of 2025 dated 16.04.2025.
4. Learned Senior Counsel for the appellant submits that the learned Single Judge should not have passed the impugned order and it is causing serious prejudice to the appellant.
5. The pivotal question is whether this intra court appeal is maintainable against an interlocutory order?
6. This Court has consistently taken a view based on the Supreme Court judgments that unless the interlocutory order has the character of a ‘judgment’, the writ appeal/Letters Patent Appeal is not maintainable.
7. Recently, in W.A.No.506 of 2025 and batch, dated
30.04.2025, this Court held as under:
“7. Admittedly, the appellants are party res
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.