SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 53622

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE RENUKA YARA,THE HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE SUJOY PAUL
T.Ramesh – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent


THE HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE SUJOY PAUL AND THE HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE RENUKA YARA COMMON JUDGMENT (Per the Hon’ble Smt. Justice Renuka Yara): Heard Sri Vedula Venkataramana, learned Senior Counsel representing Sri C.Hari Preeth, learned counsel for the appellant, Sri Muralidhar Reddy Katram, learned Government Pleader for Revenue, for the official respondents and Sri A.Ravinder Reddy, learned Senior Counsel representing Sri N.Janardhan Reddy, learned counsel for respondents No.6 to 9 in W.A.No.308 of 2025 and for respondents No.3 and 4 in W.A.No.316 of 2025. Perused the record.

2. The appeals are preferred by the appellant/respondent No.6 in W.P.No.16804 of 2011 and respondent No.3 in W.P.No.18918 of 2011 aggrieved by the impugned common order dated 19.12.2024 passed by a learned Single Judge in W.P.Nos.16804 and 18918 of 2011.

3. For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred to as they are arrayed in writ petition No.16804 of 2011.

4. The writ petition i.e. W.P.No.16804 of 2011 is filed to declare the Memo No.E/1117/2002 dated 29.01.2011 on the file of respondent No.3-The Revenue Divisional Officer, Asifabad, Adilabad District as illegal and to take steps based on the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top