IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA
P.Ramanadham – Appellant
Versus
Smt.V.Sumathi – Respondent
THE HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA CITY CIVIL COURT APPEAL No.359 OF 2019
JUDGMENT:
This is an appeal filed by the appellants, being aggrieved by the judgment and decree, dated 17.04.2019 passed in O.S.No.201 of 2014 by the learned XXVII Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Secunderabad (for short “the trial Court”).
2. The appellant herein is the plaintiff and the respondent is the defendant before the trial Court. The parties herein are referred to as they were arrayed in the suit before the trial Court for the sake of convenience and clarity.
3. The case of the plaintiff is the he is the absolute owner of the suit schedule property i.e. residential house consisting of ground floor + two upper floors of house bearing No.1-3-302 (old No.287) admeasuring 1245 sq.feet constructed on plot admeasuring 66.08 Sq.yards or 55.25 Sq.Meters situated at Comsary Bazar, Bowenpally, Secunderabad, having purchased the same from the defendant through a registered sale deed bearing document No.1469 of 2013 dated 16.09.2013. It is his case that originally the defendant being the absolute owner and possessor of the suit schedule property offered to sell the same to the plaintiff for a co
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.