SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 53668

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.VIJAYSEN REDDY
B. Ravi Simha – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent


THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B. VIJAYSEN REDDY WRIT PETITION No.18454 OF 2024 ORDER : (ORAL)

Heard Mr. Pamidighantam Patanjali, learned counsel, representing, Mr. P. Sri Ram, learned counsel for the petitioners, Mr. V. Narsimha Goud, learned standing counsel for Hyderabad Metropolitan Development Authority (HMDA), appearing for respondent Nos.2 and 5, Mr. Putta Krishna Reddy, learned standing counsel for Municipalities, appearing for respondent No.3, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Irrigation and Command Area Development.

2. Grievance of the petitioners is that several representations were submitted by them from 2019 requesting respondent authorities to consider their Layout Regularization Scheme (LRS) applications and accord approval, but the same were not considered. Petitioners submitted individual representations to respondent No.2 for regularization of their plots purchased under registered sale deeds from previous owners i.e., Mr. Balki Surya Prakash and Mr. Balki Shiva Prasad.

3. It is submitted that all the plots of the petitioners are forming part of Survey No.129 of Ghatkesar Village and Mandal. The land in Survey

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top