SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 53910

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY,THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA
Thejavath Venkati – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent


THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA W.P.No.14134 OF 2025 ORDER : (per Hon’ble Sri Justice P.Sam Koshy)

Heard Ms. M.Tejaswini, learned counsel representing Mr. P.V.Ramana, learned counsel for the petitioner, Ms. M.Shalini, learned Government Pleader for Services-II for respondent No.1, Mr. B.Rajeshwar Reddy, learned Government Pleader for the State of Andhra Pradesh for respondent Nos.2, 3 and 6 and Mr. S.Satyanarayana, learned Government Pleader for Services-I for respondent Nos.4 and 5. Perused the record.

2. The grievance of the petitioner being the inaction on the part of respondent Nos.1 and 2 in taking an appropriate decision on the representation which the petitioner has made to the officers of respondent No.2 for considering allocation from the services of State of Andhra Pradesh to the services under the State of Telangana on the ground of the petitioner’s spouse (wife) working in the Telangana State Power Distribution Company Limited (TGSPDCL), to a non-transferable post.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the two State Governments, however, have shown a sympathetic approach to the petitioner by sending

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top