SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 53952

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR
Pathlavat Nanya Naik – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent


THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T. VINOD KUMAR W.P.No. 13950 of 2025

O R D E R

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondent Nos.1 to 5, and with their consent the Writ Petition is taken up for hearing and disposal at admission stage.

2. Having regard to the manner of disposal of the writ petition and the nature of lis involved, this Court is of the view that notice to unofficial respondent Nos.6 to 11 is not necessary for adjudication of the present Writ Petition

3. The case of the petitioner, in brief, is that though the respondents-authorities have registered a case vide Crime No.256 of 2025 under the provisions of BNS read with the provisions under the SCs & STs (POA) Act, 1989 against the unofficial respondents herein, the authorities have not arrested the said respondents though they are not entitled for being granted with station bail in terms of Section 41A of Cr.P.C.,/35(3) of BNSS, which action of the respondents it is contended as highly illegal and arbitrary.

4. Per contra, learned Government Pleader appearing on behalf of respondents would submit that even though a crime is

registered under the provisions of the SCs & STs(PO

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top