I N THE HI GH COURT OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD C.R.P.No.619 OF 2025 Between:

Tumu Gopala Rao & two others … Petitioners And Smt. Ravella Kalavathi & another … Respondents JUDGMENT PRONOUNCED ON: 01.05.2025 THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTI CE SUREPALLI NANDA

1. Whether Reporters of Local newspapers : Yes may be allowed to see the Judgment?

2. Whether the copies of judgment may be : Yes marked to Law Reporters/Journals?

3. Whether Their Lordships wish to : Yes see the fair copy of the Judgment?

_________________________________

MRS. JUSTI CE SUREPALLI NANDA THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTI CE SUREPALLI NANDA C.R.P.No.619 OF 2025 % 01.05.2025 Between:

# Tumu Gopala Rao & two others ... Petitioners And $ Smt. Ravella Kalavathi & another … Respondents < Gist:

> Head Note:

! Counsel for the Petitioners : Sri M. Murali Krishna ^ Counsel for Respondents : Sri Shaik Madar ? Cases Referred:

HON’BLE MRS. JUSTI CE SUREPALLI NANDA C.R.P.No.619 of 2025

ORDER:

The present Civil Revision Petition is preferred seeking prayer as under:

“…to suspend the impugned order dated 16.11.2024 in I.A.No.247 of 2023 in O.S.No.309 of 2023 and set aside the same on the file of the Agent to the Government, Bhadradri Kothagudem, in the interest of justice and equity.”

2. This Civil Revision petition is filed challenging the propriety and legality of the order dated 06.11.2024 passed in I.A.No.247 of 2023 in O.S.No.309 of 2023 on the file of the Court of the Agent to Government, Bhadradri Kothagudem, whereby the petition filed by the plaintiffs under Rule 42(a) and (c) of T.S. Agency Rules, 1924 Read with Section 151 C.P.C., seeking suspension of the fraudulent entries reflecting the name of defendant No.1 in the occupant column of the impugned pahanies in respect of the suit scheduled land was dismissed.

3. The plea of the petitioners/plaintiffs in I.A.No.247 of 2023 is that they are in possession and enjoyment of the suit land admeasuring Ac.1-30 guntas in Sy.Nos.39, 40/1, 41, 42/1 situated at Chandrugonda Village and Mandal of the Scheduled area of Bhadradri Kothagudem District and that the defendants by managing the Mandal Revenue Inspector-I, Chandrugonda on the basis of forged and fabricated unregistered gift deed allegedly executed by Smt. Alla Kanakamma, in respect of the suit land, got issued Memo dated 20.12.2025 in Rc.No.B/2468/2005 and on the basis of the same got entered the name of Defendant No.1 in occupation column of pahanies in respect of the suit land and that the said Kanakamma died about 30 years ago but the defendants falsely got her date of death registered in the Register of Death as 21.06.2003 and that they are trying to interfere with their possession and enjoyment of the subject lands.

4. The respondents/defendants filed Counter denying the allegations made by the petitioners. They asserted title and possession over the suit land on the basis of the alleged registered gift deed/will deed bearing document No.6 of 1977 dated 15.04.1977. They stated that after the death of Kanakamma on 21.06.2003, Defendant No.1 came into possession of the suit land and ever since she had been in possession and enjoyment of the land and Defendant No.1 perfected the title over the suit land. The respondents/defendants also stated that they had filed O.S.No.452 of 2006 against the plaintiffs in respect of the suit land for perpetual injunction and the suit was decreed and in view of the decree in the suit, the present petition is not maintainable and they alleged that the suit is barred by limitation, since the death certificate of Kanakamma is challenged eighteen years after the date of registration of her death on 21.03.2003.

5. Heard Sri M. Murali Krishna, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and Sri Shaik Madar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents. Perused the Record.

6. The question whether the alleged registered gift deed/will deed is true or not can be decided only after a full-fledged trial in the suit. According to the plaintiffs, the entry of n