IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR,THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE P.SREE SUDHA
Podila Radhamma – Appellant
Versus
Madiraju Hanumantha Rao – Respondent
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T. VINOD KUMAR And THE HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE P.SREE SUDHA C.M.A. Nos.167 and 176 of 2025 COMMON JUDGMENT: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice T.Vinod Kumar These Civil Miscellaneous Appeals are directed against the order dated 11-02-2025 passed in I.A.No.37/2024 and I.A.No.36/2024 in O.S.No.2 of 2024 on the file of the I Additional District Judge at Khammam.
2. Heard learned counsel for the appellants, Sri Tarun Ram Aitham and Sri Kondadi Ajay Kumar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondents, and perused the record.
3. Since, the parties are one and the same and both the orders arise out of the same suit, these Appeals are being disposed of by this common judgment.
4. The appellants herein are plaintiffs in the suit filed by them against the respondents/defendants for the relief of declaration that appellant/plaintiff No.1 as the absolute owner of the suit schedule properties.
5. In the subject suit filed by the appellants herein, they have filed an Interlocutory Application vide I.A.No.37 of 2024 under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 CPC to restrain the respondents from interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the suit schedule property by the appellant No.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.