SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 54240

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE SUREPALLI NANDA
Dr.Chinni Srinivas Reddy – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent


HON’BLE MRS JUSTI CE SUREPALLI NANDA WRI T PETI TI ON No.27590 OF 2022

ORDER:

Heard Sri Sai Prasen Gundavaram, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Services-I appearing on behalf of the respondent Nos.1 and 2 and Sri Malipeddi Srinivas Reddy learned Standing Counsel for Osmania University.

2. The petitioners initially approached the Court seeking prayer as under:

“….to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ:

(i) Declare that the Petitioners are entitled for regularization as per Section 10 A of Act 1994 and G.O. Ms. No. 16, Finance (HRM.I) Department, dated 26-2-2016 and Judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Umadevi Vs. State of Karnataka (2006 (4) SCC 1) in terms of the proposal sent by the 2nd and 3rd Respondent dated: 06.08.2019 and 28.05.2019 respectively;

(ii) Declare the letter No. 3749/UE/A1/2017, dated 2- 11-2022 issued by the 1st Respondent as illegal, arbitrary and beyond the scope of the Writ Petition and consequently set aside the same;"

(iii) Declare that the proceedings of the 1st Respondent dated: 19.11.2019 and consequential procee

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top