SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 54338

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL
Kishtaiah Bacchu – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent
CRLP 6014/2025



ORDER:

This Criminal Petition is filed under Section under Section 528 of BNSS by the petitioners/accused Nos.1 to 3, seeking to quash the proceedings against them in FIR No.75 of 2025 on the file of Kotagiri Police Station, Nizamabad District, for the offences punishable under Sections 316 (2), 318 (4) read with 3(5) of BNS and Section

7 of Essential Commodities Act.

2. Heard learned counsel representing petitioner and Mr.E.Ganesh, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor appearing for the State. Perused the record.

3. Though this petition is filed for quashing the proceedings in the crime, during the course of arguments, learned counsel for petitioners has sought for directions to the Police to proceed with investigation by issuing notice under Section 35(3) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) (Previously Section 41-A of Cr.P.C.).

4. In view of the above, without going into merits of the case, this Criminal Petition is disposed of directing the Police concerned to proceed with the investigation in the above crime after issuing notice under Section 35(3) of BNSS (Previously Section 41-A of Cr.P.C.) to the petitioners/ accused Nos.1 to 3 and they shall also follow the guidelines of Hon’ble Supreme Court in Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar and another, (2014) 8 SCC 273. The petitioners/accused Nos.1 to 3 are directed to co-operate with the investigating officer by filing reply/explanation to the notice under Section 35(3) of BNSS and to produce any relevant documents/material papers in defence if any in concluding the investigation. Further, the Investigating Officer is directed to conduct and conclude the investigation as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of three (3) months from today in accordance with law.

Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.

_______________________

E.V. VENUGOPAL, J

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top