SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 54465

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA
Motukuri Yohanu – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent


THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA WRIT PETITION No.28221 of 2019

ORDER:

The case of the petitioner, precisely, as per the writ affidavit, is that he was appointed as a Typist, in a Full-Time contingent employee capacity under the control of respondent-Horticulture & Sericulture Department, in the year 1989. The Government has issued GOMs.No.212, Finance & Planning Department, dated 22.04.1994 wherein orders have been issued to regularise the services of temporary/daily wage/NMR/consolidated pay employees, who completed five years of service as of 25.11.1993. It is the case of the petitioner that except that he fell short of fulfilling the condition of five years of service by 25.11.1993, he fulfilled all the other conditions for regularisation. It is also his case that even as per the Hon’ble Supreme Court judgment in State of Karnataka vs. Umadevi, (2006) 4 SCC 1, rendered in the year 2006, wherein the Supreme Court directed to regularise the services of the temporary employees who completed 10 years of service within a period of six months, the petitioner is entitled for regularisation, but his services have not been regularised till today.

2. Heard Mr. S. Pradeep Kumar, le

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top