SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 54514

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR
Mohammed Muzaffaruddin – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent


O R D E R

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Government Pleader for Minority & Social Welfare appearing for respondent No.1, Sri Farhan Azam Khan, learned Standing Counsel for Waqf Board appearing for respondent Nos.3 to 15, and with their consent the Writ Petition is taken up for hearing and disposal at admission stage.

2. Having regard to the manner of disposal of the Writ Petition and the nature of lis involved, this Court is of the view that notice to respondent Nos.2, 16 to 22 is not necessary for adjudication of the present Writ Petition.

3. The case of the petitioner, in brief, is that the property of the 2nd respondent situated at Bahlool Khan Guda Village, has been encroached by unofficial respondent Nos.16 to 22, and they are taking steps to obtain permission from GHMC authorities for undertaking construction therein, and as such he has approached the AP State Waqf Board-2nd respondent herein, by submitting a representation; and that in spite of the same, no action is taken thereon, as such he has filed the present Writ Petition.

4. Sri Farhan Azam Khan, learned Standing Counsel for Waqf Board submits that since, the petitioner by his own admission admit to t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top