IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR,THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE P.SREE SUDHA
Vejjela Rama Rao – Appellant
Versus
Yellanki Narsimha Rao – Respondent
AND C.M.A. No.164 OF 2025 ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice T. Vinod Kumar)
Heard learned Counsel for the appellant, Sri Y. Ashok Raj, learned Counsel for the respondent No.1 and perused the record.
2. The Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is directed against the order dated 17.03.2025 in I.A. No.674 of 2024 in O.S. No.36 of
2024 on the file of I Additional District Judge, Warangal.
3. The appellant herein is the defendant Nos.2 to 7 in the subject suit filed by respondent No.1 for specific performance.
4. The respondent No.1 herein along with the suit had filed petition under Order XXXIX Rule 1 and 2 CPC restraining the respondents/defendants in the suit not to alienate subject property.
5. The Court below by considering the submissions made and also taking note of the fact that the 6th respondent except denying the material allegations, did not produce any document had granted order of temporary injunction in favour of the petitioner/plaintiff herein restraining the respondents/ defendants from alienating the suit schedule property till the disposal of the suit.
6. The Court below further noted that the contentions of the appellant/defendant cannot be considered as the respondent/ plaintiff had
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.