IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE SUREPALLI NANDA
Mateti Ramaswamy – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana and 3 Others – Respondent
HON’BLE MRS JUSTI CE SUREPALLI NANDA WRI T PETI TI ON No.3949 OF 2023
ORDER:
Heard Sri. Ch. Ganesh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Services-I I , appearing on behalf of respondent No.1, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Services-I , appearing on behalf of respondent No.2 and 3, and Sri Kishore Rao Puskuru, learned Standing Counsel for TS Zilla Parishads, appearing on behalf of respondent No.4.
2. The petitioner approached the Court seeking prayer as under:
“…to issue a wit order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the respondents in not counting the past temporary service rendered by the petitioner in the contingent establishment from the date of his initial appointment on 1976 to till 2018, for computation of qualifying service by reckoning contingent service rendered by the petitioner as per G.O.Ms.No. 156, Finance and Planning (FW.PEN.1) Department, dated 29.04.1983, for the purpose to sanction of pension and Gratuity on even of retirement of petitioner by applying principle laid by Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Prem Singh Vs. State of Uttar Prad
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.