SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 54567

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. BHASKAR REDDY
Sri Thadishetty Surender Rao – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent
WP 13515/2025



THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.BHASKAR REDDY WRIT PETITION No.13515 of 2025

ORDER:

This Writ Petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, is filed seeking the following relief:

“….to issue a Writ Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS or any other order or Writ declaring the action of the respondent Nos.2 to 5 in not correcting the erroneous entry by adding erroneously omitted extent of land admeasuring Ac.0.38 Gts to the extent already recorded in Patta Passbook i.e., Ac.0.39 in Sy.No.618 (old Sy.No.213/E) making it to a total extent of Ac.1.37 Gts in Sy.No.618 (old Sy.No.213/E) situated at Laxmapur Village, Muduchintalapaly Mandal, earlier Shameerpet Mandal, Medchal Malkajigiri District by considering the petitioners online Application Vide 2400034422 dated 28/05/2024 as illegal arbitrary and violation of Articles 14, 21 and 300A of the constitution of India apart from the violation of principle of natural justice and consequently direct the respondent Nos.2 to 5 to correct the erroneous entry by adding erroneously omitted extent of land admeasuring Ac.0.38 Gts to the extent already recorded in Patta Passbook i.e., Ac.0.39 in Sy.No.618 (old Sy.No.213/E) making it to a total extent of Ac.1.37 Gts in Sy.No.618 (old Sy.No.213/E) situated at Laxmapur Village Muduchintalapaly Mandal, earlier Shameerpet Mandal, Medchal Malkajigiri District by considering the petitioners online Application Vide 2400034422 dated 28/05/2024 and to pass..…”

2. Considered the submissions of the learned counsel for the respective parties and with their consent this writ petition is disposed of at the admission stage.

3. It is stated that petitioner is the absolute owner and possessor of the land admeasuring Ac.1.37 guntas in Sy.No.618 (old Sy.No.213/E) situated at Laxmanpur Village, Muduchinthalapally Mandal, Medchal Malkajgiri District, having purchased the same through registered sale deed bearing document No.5537 of 2019, dated 26.06.2019. It is further stated that the revenue authorities have mutated his name in the revenue records only to an extent of Ac.0.39 guntas, while petitioner is the absolute owner and peaceful possessor of land admeasuring Ac.1.38 guntas in the pattadar passbook issued in his favour under the provisions of the Telangana Rights in Land and Pattadar Passbook Act, 2020 (for short “the ROR Act, 2020”). It is submitted that petitioner submitted online application vide No.2400034422, dated 28.05.2024 seeking for correction of the revenue entries and consequential issuance of e-pattadar pass book in respect of the subject land. The grievance of the petitioner is that even after receiving the said application, the respondent authorities are not considering the same. Hence, the writ petition.

4. The learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for respondents has submitted that ROR Act, 2020 has been repealed and replaced with Telangana Bhu Bharati (Record of Rights in Land) Act, 2025 (for short “the Act 1 of 2025”) and if the petitioner submits online application in the prescribed format in Bhu Bharati Web Portal and if the same fulfills all the requirements of the Act 1 of 2025 and the Rules made thereunder, the respondent authorities will consider the same, in accordance with law.

5. In view of the above submissions, this Court deems it appropriate to dispose of this writ petition permitting the petitioner to make appropriate online application in the prescribed format in Bhu Bharati Web Portal, seeking correction of entries in the revenue records and for issuance of pattadar passbooks in respect of subject lands. In the event of such application being made by the petitioner and if the same fulfills all the requirements under the provisions of the Act 1 of 2025 and the Rules made thereunder, the respondent-authorities shall examine and consider the case of the petitioner. In any event, if the application of the petitioner does not fulfill the requirements of the Act 1 of 2025

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top