SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 54758

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR
M/s Murali Krishna Minerals – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent


THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T. VINOD KUMAR Writ Petition No.93 of 2025

ORDER

Heard Sri A.Praneeth, learned counsel representing Sri P.Lakshma Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Government Pleader for Mines and Geology appearing for respondent Nos.1 to 4 and perused the record.

2. The 1st petitioner, represented by the 2nd petitioner herein by the present Writ Petition, has assailed the action of the 4th respondent- authority in issuing demand notice No.236/QL/2016, dt.14.10.2024, served on the petitioner, on 03.12.2024, directing them to pay normal seigniorage fee along with five times penalty in respect of quarry lease for building and road metal granted in the patta land situated in Sy.No.23 of Sirala Village, Bhainsa Mandal, Nirmal District, as being illegal and arbitrary, with a consequential direction to set aside the same.

3. The primary contention of the petitioner is that the respondents by the impugned proceeding had demanded normal seigniorage fee along with five times penalty under Rules 26(3)(2) and 26(2) of the Telangana Minor Mineral Concession Rules 1966 (for short ‘the Rules’); and that the said authority lacks jurisdiction to levy penalty, as in terms of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top