SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 55100

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR
D. SASHIBHUSHANA NAIDU – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent
WP 36695/2018



O R D E R

Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner, learned Government Pleader for Home appearing for official respondents, and perused the record.

2. The case of the petitioner, in brief, is that though he had approached the 3rd respondent-authority and lodged a complaint, dt.29.09.2018/30.09.2018, the authorities have not registered the FIR, which action of the respondents it is contended as highly illegal and arbitrary.

3. Per contra, learned Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondents submits that a case vide Cr.No.641/2018 has been registered against the petitioner on 20.07.2018, wherein the petitioner was arrayed as accused No.1, and only to get over the aforesaid crime registered, the petitioner has approached the respondents-authorities and lodged a complaint, and as such no action is taken thereon.

4. Learned Government Pleader further submits that if the petitioner is aggrieved by the inaction of the respondents in registering the FIR based on the complaint lodged by the petitioner, dt.29.09.2018/30.09.2018, he is required to avail remedies provided under Cr.P.C.

5. I have taken note of the respective submissions made.

6. Having regard to the submissions made as above and since, a case has been registered against the petitioner vide Cr.No.641/2018, dt.20.07.2018, if the petitioner is aggrieved by the inaction of the respondents in registering a case based on his complaint dt.29.09.2018/30.09.2018, the petitioner has to avail further remedies provided under Cr.P.C., and for the said reason, cannot maintain the present Writ Petition.

7. Granting liberty as noted hereinabove, the present Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs.

8. Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed.

_____________________ T. VINOD KUMAR, J

28th April, 2025.

Dt.28.04.2025

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top