SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 55102

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR
Shaik Abrar – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent


ORDER

Heard learned counsel for petitioner, learned Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondents, and with the consent of the learned counsel appearing for the parties, the Writ Petition is taken up for hearing and disposal at admission stage.

2. The case of the petitioner, in brief, is that basing on the complaint lodged by the petitioner, the respondents-authorities having registered a case vide Cr.No.69/2023, are not conducting investigation into the aforesaid crime registered and not filing charge sheet, which action it is contended as highly illegal and arbitrary.

3. Per contra, learned Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondents submits that subsequent to the petitioner approaching the respondents-authorities and lodging a complaint, the authorities after conducting investigation into the aforesaid crime registered have filed charge sheet before the concerned Court; and that the said charge sheet has been taken cognizance by the concerned Court vide CC.No.984 of 2023 and is pending trial.

4. The aforesaid submission made by the learned Government Pleader for Home is taken on record.

5. Having regard to the fact that the respondents-authorities after conducting

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top