SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 55235

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN
Pinumalla Mohan Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Banka Purushotham – Respondent


HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.835 OF 2025

ORDER

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. N. Janardhan Reddy, learned counsel for respondent No.1 - Plaintiff. In the cause title itself, the petitioners stated that respondent Nos.2 to 32 are not necessary parties.

2. The present revision is filed challenging the order dated

12.11.2024 in I.A. No.1357 of 2024 in O.S. No.28 of 2012 passed by Principal District Judge, Karimnagar, whereby and whereunder, the petition filed by the petitioners under Order - IX, Rule - 7 read with

151 of CPC to set aside the order dated 11.10.2012 was dismissed.

3. Respondent No.1 filed a suit vide O.S. No.28 of 2012 against the petitioners herein and respondent Nos.2 to 32 for declaration of title and also for perpetual injunction. The petitioners herein are arrayed as defendantNos.14 and 16 and they were set ex parte on 11.10.2012 for non-filing of written statement. The suit is posted for defendants’ evidence. At that stage, the petitioners herein had filed an Interlocutory Application vide I.A. No.1357 of 2024 under Order - IX, Rule - VII read with 151 of CPC, to set aside the ex parte order dated

11.10.2012 on the follo

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top