SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 55252

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER
Viswam Shankar – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent


THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO.318 OF 2025

ORDER:

This Criminal Revision Case is filed questioning the Order dated 12.04.2024 in Crl.M.P.No.202 of 2024 in C.C.No.302481 of 2018 on the file of the XIV Additional Judge-cum-XVIII Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Secunderabad.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Public Prosecutor appearing for respondent No.1-

State and perused the record.

3. The learned Magistrate permitted respondent No.2/complainant to lead secondary evidence relating to documents, i.e., Photostat copies of postal returned envelopes and postal receipts, which were filed along with the complaint, under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. It was not disputed that the originals of the documents were filed before the Court below at the time of filing of the complaint. Learned Magistrate found that the case was transferred more than once to Courts for which reason the original documents, which were filed, were lost. In the said circumstances, learned Magistrate deemed it appropriate to invoke the provisions under Sections 63 and 65 of the Evidence Act.

4. It is relevant to refer Sections

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top