SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 55477

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA
D. Prashanth Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Union of India Rep by its Principal Secretary – Respondent


Judgement Key Points

What is the legal stance on re-medical examination for a candidate who was initially declared unfit and later certified fit by another hospital? How does the delay in seeking re-medical examination affect the validity of the request under IRMM and related Railway guidelines?

What is the court’s view on the impact of an apprenticeship under the Apprentices Act 1961 on subsequent engagement in Railway Group-D vacancies, and whether policy changes (e.g., 20% weightage) impact eligibility for re-medical examination?


THE HON’ BLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA WRIT PETITION No.21580 of 2017

ORDER:

The petitioner was trained in Carriage Workshop, Lallaguda, for the course of Course Completed Act Apprentice, during the period 2004 to 2007 under the Apprentice Act, 1961. In response to the Notification dated 25.06.2007, he was screened for the post of Substitute Helper-II (as fresh face) in the Scale of Rs.5200-20200 + Grade Pay Rs.1800 in Carriage Repair Workshop, Tirupati. He was subjected to medical tests as per Indian Railway Medical Manual (IRMM) by the Senior Divisional Medical Officer, Railway Hospital, Guntakal, and was certified as “unfit for all medical categories” vide Certificate dated 12.06.2009. Petitioner, on his own volition, got himself tested at Gandhi Hospital, Hyderabad, and submitted a Representation dated 23.06.2011, stating that he underwent medical examination at Gandhi Hospital, and the medical authorities certified that “No abnormality in the vision of eyes and physical fitness”. The representation was replied vide Letter dated 04.08.2011 by stating that the request of the petitioner for re-medical examination could not be considered as the appeal time was only 30 days and

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top