IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY,THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA
SRIKRISHNA EXIM LLP – Appellant
Versus
Income Tax Officer – Respondent
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA W.P.No.7528 OF 2025 ORDER : (per Hon’ble Sri Justice P.Sam Koshy)
Heard Mr. P.Soma Shekar Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms. J.Sunitha, learned Junior Standing Counsel for the Income Tax Department for respondent Nos.1 to 3. Perused the record.
2. This is a writ petition where the proceedings are either challenged to the notices which were issued under Section 148A and 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short ‘the Act’) or the assessment orders those have been passed under Section 147 of the Act which have been assailed.
3. This writ petition is being taken up today only on one of the grounds, that the notices issued under Section 148A of the Act and the subsequent initiation of proceedings under Section 148 of the Act by the jurisdictional Assessing Officer, whereas in terms of the amendment that was brought to the Income Tax Act by way of Finance Act, 2021 w.e.f., 01.04.2021 onwards, proceedings under Section 148A of the Act as also under Section 148 of the Act ought to have also been issued and proceeded in a faceless manner.
4. The contention of the petitioner is that the
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.