SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 55608

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE RENUKA YARA,THE HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE SUJOY PAUL
Gowripaga Albert Lael – Appellant
Versus
Joseph D Souza – Respondent


THE HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE SUJOY PAUL AND THE HON’BLE SMT JUSTICE RENUKA YARA WRIT APPEAL No.227 of 2025 JUDGMENT: (Per the Hon’ble the Acting Chief Justice Sujoy Paul)

Sri J. Sudheer, learned counsel for the appellants; Sri Prathamesh Kamat, learned counsel representing Sri A. Srinivasulu, learned counsel for respondent Nos.1 to 9 and Sri A.S.Vasudevan, learned counsel for respondent No.11.

2. Heard on admission.

3. This intra-Court appeal takes exception to the order of the learned Single Judge passed in W.P.No.26298 of 2024, dated 31.12.2024, whereby the learned Single Judge opined that the Writ Petition is not maintainable. The parties have confined their arguments to the question of maintainability of the Writ Petition.

Contention of the appellants/writ petitioners:-

4. Sri J. Sudheer, learned counsel for the appellants/writ petitioners submits that the Writ Petition is maintainable even against a private entity, if it is involved in public duties and performing the functions of public importance. It is also maintainable if the said body/persons are acting in a manner that affects the public rights or duties. More-so, when such body/persons are regulated or controlled by

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top