SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 55684

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER
K. Madhu Swamy – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent


THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER CRIMINAL PETITION No.1109 OF 2025

ORDER:

This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 528 of BNSS by the petitioner/accused No.1 to quash the order dated 18.12.2024 marking the affidavit dated 08.03.2024 as Ex.P4 in C.C.No.246 of 2015 on the file of XV Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad, and recall Ex.P4.

2. The petitioner is aggrieved by marking of Ex.P4 which is an affidavit dated 08.03.2014. The said affidavit allegedly signed by the petitioner was brought on record by the prosecution, though an objection was raised during the course of trial that the said affidavit cannot be marked.

3. Any trial Court would mark the documents in a criminal trial when the document is placed before it. However, the contents of any such document cannot be read unless they are proved. Merely marking Ex.P4 will not entitle the prosecution to ask the Court to consider the contents of Ex.P4. The said contents can only be looked into when there is admissible evidence about the contents being correct.

Merely marking documents will not dispense with the proof of contents of the documents.

4. In Ayaaubkhan Noorkhan Pathan v. State of Maharashtra, (2013)

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top