IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN
Devarakonda Shankara Murthy – Appellant
Versus
Are @ Pathi Subhashini – Respondent
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.3933 OF 2024
ORDER
Heard Mr. Tangeda Dayananda Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner - Judgment Debtor No.2 and Mrs. S.A.V. Ratnam, learned counsel for respondent No.1 - Decree Holder. Despite service of notice on respondent Nos.2 and 3 - Judgment Debtor Nos.1 and 3, there is no representation on their behalf.
2. The petitioner herein filed the present revision challenging the order dated 08.12.2023 passed by learned Principal Junior Civil Judge-cum-Judicial Magistrate of First Class at Huzurabad (for short ‘Executing Court’) in E.A. No.44 of 2021 in E.P. No.14 of 2014, whereby and whereunder the trial Court condoned delay of 1374 days in filing an application for setting aside the dismissal order dated
17.04.2017 and to restore the EP to its original number.
3. The petitioner herein is arrayed as judgment debtor No.2, while respondent Nos.2 and 3 are judgment debtor Nos.1 and 3 and respondent No.1 is decree-holder in E.P. No.14 of 2014. For the sake of convenience, the parties are hereinafter referred to as they were arrayed in E.P.
4. Respondent No.1 - Decree Holder filed a suit vide O.S.
No.123 of 2005 for recovery of Rs.1.0
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.