SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 55905

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR
Shaik Fathimunissa Begum – Appellant
Versus
The state of Telangana – Respondent


THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T. VINOD KUMAR W.P.No. 11898 of 2025

O R D E R

Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner, learned Government Pleader for Home appearing for official respondent Nos.1 to 3, and with the consent of the learned counsel appearing for the parties, the Writ Petition is taken up for hearing and disposal, at admission stage.

2. Having regard to the manner of disposal of the Writ Petition and the nature of lis involved, this Court is of the view that notice to unofficial respondent Nos.4 & 5 is not necessary for adjudication of the present Writ Petition.

3. Shorn of unnecessary details, the case of the petitioner in brief is that though she has approached the 2nd respondent and submitted a representation, dt.13.04.2025, to provide police protection, the said authorities are not taking any action on the aforesaid representation submitted, which action on the part of the respondents-authorities it is contended to be contrary to Section 21 of The Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 (for short ‘the Act’).

4. Per contra, learned Government Pleader appearing on behalf of respondent Nos.1 to 3 would submit that if the petitioner intends to invoke th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top