IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE RENUKA YARA,THE HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE SUJOY PAUL
Maddali Sri Sai Venkata Satyanarayana – Appellant
Versus
The State Bank of India – Respondent
THE HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE SUJOY PAUL AND THE HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE RENUKA YARA WRIT APPEAL No.438 of 2025 JUDGMENT (Per the Hon’ble the Acting Chief Justice Sujoy Paul)
Heard Sri Vedula Srinivas, learned Senior Counsel representing Ms. Vedula Chitralekha, learned counsel for the appellants.
2. During the course of hearing, learned Senior counsel for the appellants fairly submitted that against the order dated 05.03.2025 passed by the Debts Recovery Tribunal-II at Hyderabad, the appellants’ appeal is admittedly pending before the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal, Kolkata (for short, ‘ the appellate Tribunal’). However, the appellate Tribunal needs to hear the appellants on the question of waiver of deposit. Till such time the said question is decided and the appellants’ interim prayer is considered by the appellate Tribunal, the appellants may be protected. He further submits that the appellants will forthwith file applications for stay and preponement of the appeal before the appellate Tribunal and till such time the said applications are decided, the appellants may be protected.
3. In our opinion, learned Single Judge declined interference in W.P.No.10600 of 2025 on the ba
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.