SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 56093

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE K. SUJANA
State of Telangana – Appellant
Versus
Silveru Chandraiah – Respondent
CRP 2268/2022



THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE K. SUJANA

2358 and 2427 of 2022

COMMON ORDER

Since all these Civil Revision Petitions are arising out of the issue, they are analogously heard together and being disposed of by this common order.

2. Civil Revision Petition No.2268 of 2022: This Civil Revision Petition is filed by the petitioners to set aside the order dated 06.06.2022 passed in I.A.No. 423 of 2022 in A.S. No. 13 of 2020 by the Principal District Judge at Nalgonda. By the impugned order, the petition filed under Section 24(b) of TSCF and SV Act read with Section 151 of the CPC to permit the respondents to pay the Court fee and declare them as owner of the schedule property, was allowed by the trial Court.

3. Civil Revision Petition No.2315 of 2022: This Civil Revision Petition is filed by the petitioners to set aside the order dated 06.06.2022 passed in I.A.No. 424 of 2022 in A.S. No. 14 of 2020 by the Principal District Judge at Nalgonda. By the impugned order, the petition filed under Section 24(b) of TSCF and SV Act read with Section 151 of the CPC to permit the respondents to pay the Court fee and declare them as owner of the schedule property, was allowed by the trial Court..

4. Civil Revision Petition No.2341 of 2022: This Civil Revision Petition is filed by the petitioners to set aside the order dated 06.06.2022 passed in I.A.No. 421 of 2022 in A.S. No. 11 of 2020 by the Principal District Judge at Nalgonda. By the impugned order, the petition filed under Section 24(b) of TSCF and SV Act read with Section 151 of the CPC to permit the respondents to pay the Court fee and declare them as owner of the schedule property, was allowed by the trial Court.

5. Civil Revision Petition No.2358 of 2022: This Civil Revision Petition is filed by the petitioners to set aside the order dated 06.06.2022 passed in I.A. No. 425 of 2022 in A.S. No. 15 of 2020 by the Principal District Judge at Nalgonda.By the impugned order, the petition filed under Section 24(b) of TSCF and SV Act read with Section 151 of the CPC to permit the respondents to pay the Court fee and declare them as owner of the schedule property, was allowed by the trial Court.

6. Civil Revision Petition No.2427 of 2022: This Civil Revision Petition is filed by the petitioners to set aside the order dated 06.06.2022 passed in I.A. No. 422 of 2022 in A.S. No. 12 of 2020 by the Principal District Judge at Nalgonda.By the impugned order, the petition filed under Section 24(b) of TSCF and SV Act read with Section 151 of the CPC to permit the respondents to pay the Court fee and declare them as owner of the schedule property, was allowed by the trial Court.

7. For the sake of convenience, hereinafter, the parties will be referred to as arrayed before the trial Court.

8. The brief facts of the case are that the plaintiffs filed O.S. Nos. 31, 32 of 1993 and 46, 47, 48 of 1995 before the Senior Civil Judge at Nalgonda (for short ‘the trial Court’ )for declaration of title and for recovery of possession in respect of the suit schedule properties and the trial Court vide common judgment dated 22.03.2018 while partly allowing the suits observed that the plaintiffs sought for declaration of the title without paying the Court fee and directed the defendants to pay the mesne profits by vacating the suit schedule properties. Aggrieved by the same, the defendants filed A.S.Nos.11, 12, 13, 14 and 15 of 2020 before the Principal District Judge at Nalgonda (for short ‘the Appellate Court’). During the pendency of the appeal, the plaintiffs filed I.A. Nos. 421, 422, 423, 424 and 425 of 2022 for permitting them to pay the Court fee and also to declare them as owner of the schedule properties.

9. By the impugned orders dated 06.06.2022, the Appellate Court has allowed the I.As. Hence, the present revision petitions. 10. Heard learned Government Pleader for Arbitration appearing for the revision petitioners and Sri Jella Nagaraj, learned counsel for the respondents. Perused the material available on record.

11.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top