THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH

ORDER

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and without issuing any notice to the respondents, this contempt case is disposed of at the stage of admission. 2. This contempt case is filed by the petitioners to punish the respondents for willful disobedience of the order dated 22.02.2024 in W.P.No.1857 of 2024.

3. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioners, this Court has passed oral order in dismissing the instant Contempt Case on 17.04.2025 and while dictating the orders, this Court observed that the petitioners have not filed the entire documents filed in C.C.No.1125 of 2024 in W.P.No.1857 of 2024. In view of the same, the matter was listed under the caption “For being mentioned” on 25.04.2025 and called for the entire record in C.C.No.1125 of 2024 in W.P.No.1857 of 2024.

4. The petitioners herein are arrayed as the respondent Nos.7 and 8 in W.P.No.1857 of 2024. After hearing both sides, this Court disposed of W.P.No.1857 of 2024 on 22.02.2024. The relevant portion in para Nos.7 and 8 is as follows:-

“7. After hearing both sides and perusing the entire material on record, this Court is of the considered view that the respondent No.7 and 8 without having valid permissions commenced the construction activity in the subject property. Thereafter the respondent No. 8 made application for construction permission and the respondent No.5 did not pass any orders for the same. In fact the respondent No.5 issued notice to the respondent No.8 to stop construction on the ground that there is no valid permission to construction of building and the construction of the respondent Nos.7 and 8 amounts to unauthorized construction.

8. In view of the above findings, the writ petition is allowed directing the official respondents to stop further construction activity of the respondents Nos. 7 and 8 in Sy.No.68/1, 69/1/1, 69/1/2 and 70/1to an extent of land Ac.2.10 guntas situated at Venkatapuram Village of Thurkapally Mandal, YadadriBhuvanagiri District, till a valid construction permission obtained from concerned authorities. If respondent Nos.7 and 8 are continue with their construction activity on the subject property, the same is liable to be demolished on the ground that construction is unauthorized., 5. After disposal of W.P.No.1857 of 2024 on 22.02.2024, the respondent No.7 herein filed C.C.No.1125 of 2024 against the petitioners herein and also the official respondents herein in view of the continuation of the construction by the petitioners without any valid permission in spite of the direction of this Court.

6. In the said contempt case, the official respondents have filed counter stating that the petitioners herein without obtaining permission have continued the constructions and the respondent authorities have issued notices to them. In the said contempt case, the petitioner herein and the also the respondent No.3- District Panchayat Officer and the respondent No.4- Panchayat Secretary filed counters. The petitioners herein being respondent Nos.6 and 7 in C.C.No.1125 of 2024 filed counters stating that after passing of the orders of this Court, they have never raised any further construction except construction of some steps and ramp to access to the subject property. The District Panchayat Officer in his counter in C.C.No.1125 of 2024 has stated that the Panchayat Secretary has submitted a report dated 04.04.2024 and issued notice to the petitioners herein to stop illegal constructions and directed to obtain valid permission from the concerned authorities as per the directions of the Court. The District Panchayat Officer has again issued memo No.225/2024/District Panchayat dated 22.07.2024 for complying with the orders of this Court for stopping of construction. In spite of that the petitioners herein have not stopped the construction and thereafter, the respondents have issued notice to the petitioners on 21.03.2025 directing to remove the illegal constructions. In spite of that the petit