Karnataka HC Notices Sri Lankan Judge's Rights Plea
07 Mar 2026
Karnataka Proposes Social Media Ban for Under-16s
07 Mar 2026
Justice Dharmadhikari Sworn In as 55th Madras HC Chief Justice
07 Mar 2026
Punjab HC Acquits Ram Rahim in Journalist Murder
07 Mar 2026
Appellate Courts Can Rely on Unexhibited Public Documents Produced by Plaintiff: Gujarat High Court Dismisses Second Appeal Under Section 100 CPC
07 Mar 2026
Punjab & Haryana HC Denies Anticipatory Bail in Murder via Humiliation Case: Sections 103(1) & 3(5) BNS
07 Mar 2026
Security Deposit Forfeiture Without Show-Cause Notice Violates Natural Justice: Himachal Pradesh High Court
07 Mar 2026
S.202 CrPC Inquiry Not Mandatory for Public Servant Complaints If Accused Outside Jurisdiction: Supreme Court
09 Mar 2026
Professor MP Singh: Shaper of Constitutional Discourse
09 Mar 2026
Back
Next 
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE K. SUJANA
Kakunoori Srikanth – Appellant
Versus
Sri Shiva Kumar Goud – Respondent
THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE K. SUJANA
ORDER:
This Contempt Case is filed seeking the Court to punish respondent No.2, under the provision of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for deliberate, violation and willful disobedience of the order made in I.A.No.1 of 2024 in Crl.P.No.15953 of 2024 dated 21.12.2024.
2. Heard Sri Dunna Ambedkar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the respondent - State.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that this Court, by its detailed order dated 21.12.2024 in I.A.No.1 of 2024 in Crl.P.No.15953 of 2024, was pleased to grant temporary bail to the petitioner from 21.12.2024 to 31.12.2024 to enable him to perform the last rites of his late mother as per Hindu customs and that this Court directed that the petitioner be released on executing a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- to the satisfaction of th
Willful disobedience of court orders constitutes contempt, necessitating penalties to uphold judicial authority.
Contempt of Court – Courts ordinarily take lenient approach in a case of some delay in compliance of orders, unless same is deliberate and willful.
The necessity of proving the contemnor's knowledge of the court's order beyond reasonable doubt is essential to establish civil contempt under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.
Prompt compliance with court orders, especially by senior government officials, is essential to uphold the rule of law and ensure the effectiveness of judicial decisions.
The court must be satisfied beyond reasonable doubt that the contemnor has willfully, deliberately and intentionally violated the court's order. If the disobedience is the result of some compelling c....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the significance of prompt and timely compliance with court orders, the need to respect and obey court orders, and the importance of protecting the....
Failure to comply with a court order, even pending appeal without stay, constitutes contempt of court.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
Listen Article