SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 56564

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE G.RADHA RANI
Surajmal Panwar – Appellant
Versus
Smt Shiv Pyario Bai – Respondent


THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE G.RADHA RANI

COMMON JUDGMENT:

Both these appeals are preferred by the appellants-defendants aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 28.02.2019 in O.S. No.541 of 2008 passed by the XIV Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad.

2. CCCA No.205 of 2019 was filed against the decree passed in favour of the respondent-plaintiff while CCCA No.228 of 2019 was preferred against the dismissal of the counter claim of the appellants-

defendants.

3. For the sake of convenience, the parties are hereinafter referred as arrayed before the trial court.

4. O.S.No.541 of 2008 was filed by the respondent-plaintiff seeking to declare her as owner of the property bearing Municipal No.15-7-390, admeasuring 34.66 sq.yds., situated at Begum Bazar, Hyderabad and to direct the defendants to vacate and hand-over vacant possession of the said property. She claimed Rs.1,00,000/- towards past mesne profits and Rs.50,000/- per month for future mesne profits along with permanent injunction, restraining the defendants or anyone claiming through them from dealing with the suit property.

5. The case of the plaintiff was that her husband late Balkishan Panwar had purchased two mulgies

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top