SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 56571

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE JUVVADI SRIDEVI
Vattipally Venkateshwar Reddy – Appellant
Versus
Vattipally Balakrishna Reddy – Respondent


THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE JUVVADI SRIDEVI CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.3926 of 2024

O R D E R

This Civil Revision Petition is filed by the petitioner-plaintiff seeking to quash the proceedings against him in O.S.No.41 of 2017 on the file of Junior Civil Judge, Jadcherla.

2. Heard Sri L.Preetham Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner-plaintiff and Sri G.Kalyan Chakravarthy for respondents.

Perused the record.

3. Brief facts leading to the filing of the present Civil Revision Petition is that the petitioner/plaintiff has filed the suit for perpetual injunction from alienating the suit schedule property to third parties in view of existence of tombs of his ancestors. Further, when defendant No.1 denied the same, he filed the present petition for appointment of advocate commissioner to note the physical features about the existence of tombs of his ancestors in the suit schedule property.

4. The trial Court held in its order as under:

Since, the suit is for injunction simplicitor, it is for the petitioner to prove about the existence of tombs of his ancestors in the suit schedule property by placing sufficient oral and documentary evidence and cannot seek the assistance of the Court for lo

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top