SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 56648

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN
Madadi Madhava Reddy – Appellant
Versus
Madadi Surender Reddy – Respondent


HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN CIVIL REVISION PETITION Nos.5 & 7 of 2025 COMMMON ORDER Heard Sri Tangeda Dayananda Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner - plaintiff and Sri N. Naveen Kumar, learned counsel for the respondent - defendant. Perused the record.

2. The petitioner herein had filed a suit vide O.S.No.95 of 2016 against the respondent herein for perpetual injunction restraining him and his agents etc., from interfering with his possession over the suit schedule property. The said suit was decreed on 27.02.2017 ex parte. Therefore, the respondent herein had filed two applications i.e., I.A.No.839 of 2022 under Section 5 of the Limitation Act to condone the delay of 1979 days from 28.02.2017 to 29.07.2022 in filing petition under Order IX Rule 13 C.P.C to set-aside the ex parte decree and I.A.No.712 of 2022 under Order IX Rule 13 C.P.C to set-aside the ex parte decree and judgment dated

27.02.2017 contending as follows:

(i) He is diagnosed with CAD-Usnstable Angina, LBBB, CAG-SVD (LAD) (27/4/21) and planned for PTCA to LAD with 1 DES and seriously fell-ill. He was advised to take bed rest.

(ii) He was aged 75 years as on the said date.

(iii) Apart from the aforesaid ailments,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top