SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 56689

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK
Gillela Suvarna – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent
WP 25087/2024



THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK W.P.No.25087 of 2024

ORDER:

This writ petition is filed with the following prayer:

“To grant appropriate relief more particularly one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus under Article 226 of the Constitution of India (i) declaring the action of the 5th respondent in entertaining and implementing the letter No.908/Kollapur/camp office/transfer dated 26.08.2022 issued by the Hon’ble M.L.A. 85-Kollapur Assembly Constituency and consequential endorsement issued by the then Hon’ble Minister for Finance and HM&FW and Endt.No.2899/Min (Fin HM & FW) dated 27.08.2022 by issuing Memo No.8462/G/2022- 1 dated 19.09.2022 by the 2nd respondent constitute misconduct under the All India Services (Conduct) Rules, 1968 and contrary to various decisions rendered by the Hon’ble Supreme Court (ii) declare the action of the 2nd and 3rd respondents in not complying with the judgment of the Hon’’ble Court dated 03.05.2024 in Writ Appeal No. 348 of 2024 not only arbitrary, illegal, discriminatory, malafide, but also constitute misconduct apart from willfully and intentionally doing undue favour to the 9th respondent (iii) declare the action of the 6th and 8th respondents producing fabricated/manipulated records before the learned Single Judge on 12.01.2024 to the effect that 9th respondent has given undertaking for accepting the conditions imposed for mutual transfer on 30.06.2022 is nothing but misleading the Hon’ble Court to deny the relief to the petitioner and to do undue favour to the 9th respondent and liable for appropriate action including disciplinary action violating the fundamental rights of the petitioner under Article 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India (iv)

and issue consequential directions (a) directing the 4th respondent to forthwith initiate departmental proceedings against the 5th respondent being the then Secretary to Government for the misconduct committed by the 5th respondent being the then Secretary to Government by issuing Memo No 8462/G/2022-1 dated 19.09.2022 at the instance of the M.L.A. Kollapur as well as the then Hon’ble Minister for Finance and Health, Medical and Family Welfare apart from issuing the general directions to all the executive authorities not to act at the instance of people’s representatives and political executives contrary to law and at the cost of depriving the rights of the others and take appropriate action as per law (b) direct the 1st respondent to forthwith initiate appropriate disciplinary proceedings against the 2nd and 3rd respondents for the misconduct committed by them by not implementing the judgment of the Hon’ble High Court dated 03.05.2024 in Writ Appeal No.348 of 2024 and issue appropriate directions to all the executive authorities to implement the orders of the Hon’ble Courts without any delay more particularly the orders relating to service matters of the government employees (c) direct the 1st respondent to forthwith initiate appropriate disciplinary proceedings against the 6th and 8th respondents for producing fabricated/manipulated records before the learned Single Judge on 12.01.2024 to the effect that 9th respondent has given undertaking for accepting the conditions imposed for mutual transfer on 30.06.2022 and take appropriate action as per law (d) direct the 1st respondent to forthwith conduct investigation enquiry through 4th respondent against the Respondents No.6, 7, 8 and 9 with regard to possession of disproportionate assets to the known source of income by adopting corrupt practices by doing undue favour to some employees at the cost of others and take appropriate further action as per law (e) direct the respondents No.5, 6, 7, 8 and 9 to pay appropriate compensation of an amount of Rs.20 lakhs for the mental agony, humiliation frustration subjected by the petitioner, which can be proportionately distributed by them in the interest of justice”.

2. Heard Sri P.V.Krishnaiah, learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Govern

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top