IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR
Battu Saidi Reddy – Appellant
Versus
Battu Madhav Reddy – Respondent
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T. VINOD KUMAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.651 OF 2025
ORDER
This Civil Revision Petition is preferred against the order dated 25-10-2024 passed in I.A. No.90 of 2021 in I.A. No.176 of 2019 in O.S. No.202 of 2019 on the file of the I Additional Junior Civil Judge at Miryalaguda.
2. The petitioner Nos.1 and 2 herein are defendants in the suit filed by the respondents herein as plaintiff vide O.S.No.202 of
2019 for grant of perpetual injunction.
3. Heard Smt. N Aarti, learned Counsel for petitioners, and perused the record.
4. In the subject suit filed by the respondent No.1 and 2 herein, the petitioners have filed the underlying interlocutory application under Order XXVI Rule 9 CPC for appointment of advocate commissioner to note down the physical features and boundaries of land, claiming it is just and necessary for adjudication of the suit. The said interlocutory application is filed in IA No. 176 of 2019 in O.S. 202 of 2019, whereunder an order of injunction is granted in favour of respondent herein.
5. Petitioner contends that the Court below has failed to observe that the respondent/plaintiff by taking advantage of ad- interim injunction order in I.A. No. 176
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.