SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 56700

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR
Battu Saidi Reddy – Appellant
Versus
Battu Madhav Reddy – Respondent


THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T. VINOD KUMAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.651 OF 2025

ORDER

This Civil Revision Petition is preferred against the order dated 25-10-2024 passed in I.A. No.90 of 2021 in I.A. No.176 of 2019 in O.S. No.202 of 2019 on the file of the I Additional Junior Civil Judge at Miryalaguda.

2. The petitioner Nos.1 and 2 herein are defendants in the suit filed by the respondents herein as plaintiff vide O.S.No.202 of

2019 for grant of perpetual injunction.

3. Heard Smt. N Aarti, learned Counsel for petitioners, and perused the record.

4. In the subject suit filed by the respondent No.1 and 2 herein, the petitioners have filed the underlying interlocutory application under Order XXVI Rule 9 CPC for appointment of advocate commissioner to note down the physical features and boundaries of land, claiming it is just and necessary for adjudication of the suit. The said interlocutory application is filed in IA No. 176 of 2019 in O.S. 202 of 2019, whereunder an order of injunction is granted in favour of respondent herein.

5. Petitioner contends that the Court below has failed to observe that the respondent/plaintiff by taking advantage of ad- interim injunction order in I.A. No. 176

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top