SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 56807

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN
Rekulapally Bhoopathi Reddy – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent


HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN CRIMINAL PETITION No.3229 OF 2025

ORDER

On 05.03.2025 this Court ordered notice to respondent No.2 and personal notice was also permitted. In compliance with the said order, learned counsel for the petitioner has filed memo vide U.S.R.No.33815 of 2025 dated 25.03.2025 along with returned cover with an endorsement “No such person in this address”. Therefore, this Court directed the investigating officer in Crime No.280 of 2017 to serve notice on the 2nd respondent and file proof of service. On 04.04.2025 learned Additional Public Prosecutor informed this Court that the investigating officer in the subject crime went to the residence of respondent No.2 to serve notice in compliance with the order of this Court dated 27.03.2025, but the door was locked. On enquiry, he came to know that respondent No.2 was in Pondicherry. He sought time to serve notice personally.

2. The Sub-Inspector of Police, Nizamabad Rural Police Station, has filed an affidavit stating that pursuant to the letter received from the Public Prosecutor’s Office on 27.03.2025, he made phone calls to respondent No.2 on 27.03.2025 and finally at 05:28 PM, respondent No.2 attended the phone

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top