SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Headnote Court Copy Facts Arguments Court observation Judicial Analysis Case Map Category Hierarchy Table of Content
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 57104

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE RENUKA YARA,THE HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE SUJOY PAUL
Chandra Sena Reddy Proddutur – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent
WP(PIL) 23/2025



WRIT PETITION (PIL) No.23 of 2025 ORDER: (Per the Hon’ble the Acting Chief Justice Sujoy Paul)

The petitioner - Sri Chandra Sena Reddy Proddutur, appeared in person and Sri Mohd. Imran Khan, learned Additional Advocate General for the State of Telangana, for the respondents.

2. Heard on admission.

3. In this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for issuance of a writ of mandamus for the State of Telangana to appoint Law Commission for the State of Telangana. He submits that as observed by the Supreme Court in Dalip Singh v. State of U.P., (2010) 2 SCC 114 many amendments as per the circumstances as on today are required.

4. On a specific query from the Bench, the petitioner fairly submitted that there is no statutory or constitutional requirement for appointment of a Law Commission in every State.

5. Learned Additional Advocate General took the same stand.

6. The judgment cited by the petitioner in Dalip Singh (supra) has no relevance. In the absence of showing any such legal requirement, interference is declined.

7. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. No order as to costs.

Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.

SUJOY PAUL, ACJ RENUKA YARA, J

WRIT PETITION (PIL) No.23 of 2025 (Per the Hon’ble the Acting Chief Justice Sujoy Paul)

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top