SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 57127

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. BHASKAR REDDY
Chada Sudhakar Reddy – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent
WP 10568/2025



HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.BHASKAR REDDY WRIT PETITION No.10568 of 2025

ORDER:

This Writ Petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, is filed seeking the following relief:

“….to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the in action of 3rd respondent in not correcting of petitioner names in the Revenue Records pertaining to petitioner’s lands i.e. Survey No.933/E/B/1 an extent of Ac.0.01 guntas Survey No.933/E/B/2 an extent of Ac.0.01 guntas Survey No.1/E/B an extent of Ac.0.05 guntas Survey No.1/E/A/2 an extent of Ac.0.03 guntas Survey No.866/2/A/C/1 an extent of Ac.0.06 guntas Survey No.66/2/A/C/2 an extent of Ac.0.06 guntas Total extent EQUAL TO Ac.0.26 guntas situated Uppar Malyala Village, Gangadhara Mandal, Karimnagar District, TG as illegal, improper, arbitrary and unconstitutional and against the principles of natural justice consequently direct the 3rd respondent to correction of Petitioner name in the concerned Revenue Records pertaining to above said lands.…”

2. Considered the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner; Sri L. Ravinder, learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for the respondent Nos.1 to 3 and perused the record.

3. The petitioner claims to be the owner and possessor of land to No.866/2/A/C/1, an extent of Ac.0.06 guntas in Survey No.66/2/A/C/2, in total admeasuring Ac.0.26 guntas, situated at Uppar Malyala Village, Gangadhara Mandal, Karimnagar District, having acquired the same from his ancestors. It is further stated that the names of their predecessors-in-interest were recorded in the revenue records and the revenue authorities have mutated their names in the revenue records and also issued pattadar passbooks vide passbook No.25370 and Khata No.887 in their favour. It is further stated that while updating the entries in the revenue records, when certain extent of lands are missing in the Dharani Portal, he submitted an application vide No.2400086366 dated 24.08.2024 for correcting the said entries, and even after lapse of more than six months, the respondent authorities are not considering the same, to enable him to receive various incentives as investment subsidies sanctioned by the Government under various schemes for cultivation of the lands. Hence, this writ petition.

4. In view of the above, since it is stated that the petitioner has already submitted application for correction of the entries, this Court is of the opinion that ends of justice would be met if the respondents are directed to examine the application vide No.2400086366 dated 24.08.2024 submitted by the petitioner. If it is found that the petitioner satisfies all the requirements for correction of the entries, the respondent authorities are directed to consider the same and pass a reasoned order in accordance with law and communicate the same to the petitioner, within a period of two (2) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

5. With the above observations, this Writ Petition is disposed of.

No order as to costs.

As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.

__________________________ C.V.BHASKAR REDDY, J Date: 08.04.2025 sus

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top