SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 57172

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN
Gandra Bhupal Reddy – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent


THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN

ORDER:

Heard Sri V. Hariharan, learned Senior Counsel representing Sri Rohit Pogula, learned counsel for petitioner, and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Mines and Geology appearing for respondent Nos.2 to 4.

2. Perusal of record would reveal that 4th respondent has issued demand notice dated 28.06.2024 to the petitioner directing him to pay an amount of Rs.1,34,08,980/- towards normal seigniorage fee, Rs.6,70,44,900/- towards five (5) times penalty and Rs.1,07,27,184/- towards permit fee, in total Rs.9,57,40,118/-. Challenging the said demand notice, petitioner has filed a revision on 23.07.2024 before 1st respondent/revisional authority in terms of Rule 35-A of the Telangana State Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1966 (for short ‘the Rules’) and it is pending. While the matter stood thus, 3rd respondent has issued a show cause notice dated 08.08.2024 to petitioner with regard to determination of his quarry lease as per Rule 31(xvi) of the Rules. Thereafter, vide proceedings dated 12.09.2024, 3rd respondent determined the lease held by petitioner. Challenging the said proceedings, petitioner had filed a Writ Petition vide W.P.No.26447 of 2

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top