IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN
Gandra Bhupal Reddy – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN
ORDER:
Heard Sri V. Hariharan, learned Senior Counsel representing Sri Rohit Pogula, learned counsel for petitioner, and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Mines and Geology appearing for respondent Nos.2 to 4.
2. Perusal of record would reveal that 4th respondent has issued demand notice dated 28.06.2024 to the petitioner directing him to pay an amount of Rs.1,34,08,980/- towards normal seigniorage fee, Rs.6,70,44,900/- towards five (5) times penalty and Rs.1,07,27,184/- towards permit fee, in total Rs.9,57,40,118/-. Challenging the said demand notice, petitioner has filed a revision on 23.07.2024 before 1st respondent/revisional authority in terms of Rule 35-A of the Telangana State Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1966 (for short ‘the Rules’) and it is pending. While the matter stood thus, 3rd respondent has issued a show cause notice dated 08.08.2024 to petitioner with regard to determination of his quarry lease as per Rule 31(xvi) of the Rules. Thereafter, vide proceedings dated 12.09.2024, 3rd respondent determined the lease held by petitioner. Challenging the said proceedings, petitioner had filed a Writ Petition vide W.P.No.26447 of 2
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.