SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 57211

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO
Banoth Shobhan Babu – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent


ORDER:

This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India seeking the following relief/s:-

“… an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus by declaring that the action of the Respondents in not considering my case for Notional date of seniority on par with the Junior in terms of proviso to rule 33(b) of Telangana State and Subordinate Services Rules as absolutely illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and violative of Article 14, 16 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondents to grant the Notional date of appointment with effect from 04.11.2010 on par with Juniors as per Merit list in terms of the statutory rules with all consequential benefits such as re- fixation of pay scale, seniority and other service benefits in the interest of justice and pass such other order or orders …”

2. Heard Ms.Mantha Lakshmi Anusha, learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Government Pleader for Services-I for respondents. Perused the record.

3. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the lis in the present Writ Petition is squarely covered by the orde

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top