IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR
Battamekala Srinu – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent
COMMON ORDER
Since, the lis involved in these Writ Petitions is one and the same, they are being taken up for hearing and disposal by this common order.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondent No.6, and with the consent of the learned counsel appearing for the parties, both the Writ Petitions are taken up for hearing and disposal at the admission stage.
3. Having regard to the nature of lis involved in the Writ Petitions and the manner of disposal, this Court is of the view that notice to unofficial respondent Nos.7 to 15 is not necessary for adjudication of the present Writ Petitions.
4. When the matters are taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Government Pleader for Home appearing for the respective respondents, in both the writ petitions, submit that the issue involved in these Writ Petitions is squarely covered by a decision of this Court in WP.No.10243 of 2025, dt.07.04.2025, and the said order would apply in all force to the facts of the present cases.
5. Recording the same, for reasons alike as were stated in the Writ Petition, vide W.P.No.10243 of 2025, dt.07.04.2025, and in term
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.