THE HON’BLE JUSTICE MOUSHUMI BHATTACHARYA AND THE HON’BLE JUSTICE B.R.MADHUSUDHAN RAO I.A.NO.2 OF 2024 IN/AND FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO.223 OF 2024 Mr. N Hari Prasad, learned counsel appearing for the appellant.

Mr. N Vishal, learned counsel appearing for the respondent.

JUDGMENT:

(Per Hon’ble Justice Moushumi Bhattacharya)

1. The appellant has filed I.A.No.2 of 2024 for condoning the delay of 553 days in filing the Appeal against the order passed by the learned Family Court on 26.12.2022.

2. The appeal was filed on 02.08.2024.

3. On 04.03.2025, we noted that the reasons given by the appellant in I.A.No.2 of 2024 do not satisfy the requirements under section 5 of The Limitation Act, 1963 and paragraph 3 of the I.A. does not provide any reasons for the delay of 553 days in filing the Family Court Appeal (FCA).

4. On 04.03.2025, the Court accordingly gave the appellant an opportunity to file an improved affidavit to explain the delay in filing the FCA.

5. On 18.03.2025, the Court further recorded that the improved affidavit fails to disclose any reasons for the condonation of the delay of 553 days in filing the FCA.

6. We find from the records that the appellant has filed I.A.No.1 of 2025. Lear