SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 57334

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY
E. Santosh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Rolla Hari Venkata Poornachandra Raju – Respondent


HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY

JUDGMENT:

Challenging the validity and legality of the judgment and decree dated 27.04.2023 in A.S.No.227 of 2018 passed by the III Additional District Judge at Ranga Reddy District, confirming the judgment dated 11.09.2018 in O.S.No.934 of 2008 passed by the I Additional Senior Civil Judge at Ranga Reddy District, the present Second Appeal is filed.

2. Heard Sri Pottigari Sridhar Reddy, learned counsel for the Appellant.

3. The appellant herein is defendant No.4 and respondent No.1 is plaintiff and respondent Nos.2 to 4 are defendant Nos.1 to 3 before the trial Court. For convenience, the parties are hereinafter referred to as they were referred in the suit.

4. The facts of the case, in brief, are that plaintiff filed a suit for perpetual injunction in respect of suit schedule A property and to declare the title of plaintiff in respect of schedule B property and other consequential relief of physical possession after dismantling the temporary structures.

5. In the plaint, it is averred that, originally, one Kavali Yellaiah and Mohd.Hayath were joint owners and possessors of the agricultural land in Sy.No.92 admeasuring Acs.14.13 guntas situ

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top