THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE K. SUJANA

ORAL ORDER:

Challenging the decree and judgment dated 30.06.2006 passed in O.S.No.22 of 1997 by the learned I Additional Senior Civil Judge, Ranga Reddy District at L.B. Nagar, Hyderabad, the present appeal suit is filed.

2. Heard Sri A. Pulla Reddy, learned counsel appearing for the appellant, and Sri R.A. Chary, learned counsel appearing for the respondents.

3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the appellant and the respondents that, during the pendency of the present appeal suit, the parties have arrived at a compromise.

4. Vide order dated 01.04.2025, this Court directed the parties, along with their respective counsel, to appear before the Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee, High Court for the State of Telangana, Hyderabad, for identification and to submit a report.

5. Pursuant to the direction of this Court, the parties, i.e., the appellant and respondent Nos.2 and 4, appeared before the Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee. The Secretary identified the parties and submitted a report dated 03.04.2025, which has been placed on record. However, respondent Nos.3 and 5 were not identified. In support of their compromise, the parties filed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) vide I.A.No.3 of 2025 on 10.03.2025.

6. The terms and conditions of the Memorandum of Understanding are as follows:

1. That in pursuance of the above said understanding, both the parties agreed to settle the issue and the 2^nd party agreed to forego/relinquish all their rights and interests in and over the House bearing No. i.e., H.No:4-1-92/1, Plot No:6, Bhavani Nagar, Nacharam, St No:2, Hyderabad. Which is subject matter, in A.S.No.528/2006 on the file of the Hon'ble High Court, Telangana. And in the said appeal the 1^st Party is the appellant.

2. That in pursuance of the above said understanding, both the parties agreed to settle the issue and the 1^st Party agreed to forego/relinquish all their rights and interest in and over the agricultural land in Sy.Nos:16 & 25 to an extent of Ac.9.27 Guntas situated at Azmapuram village, P.A. Pally Mandal which belongs to 2^nd party. Which is subject matter, in OS.No.248/2024 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Devarakonda, Nalgonda District, Telangana.

3. That in pursuance of the above said understanding the 2^nd Party shall get mutated the House bearing No.4-1-92/1, Plot No:6, Bhavani Nagar, Nacharam, St No:2, Hyderabad in to the name of the Smt. T.Aruna (i.e., First wife of Late T.Narender Reddy) and also agreed to co-operate with the mutation proceedings before the municipal authorities if needed and also before any authority so as to enable to get a clear and undisputed title over the House property.

4. That in pursuance of the above said understanding the 1^st Party agreed to pay Rs.8,00,000/- (Rupees Eight Lakhs only) for full and final settlement to the 2^nd party, and the 1^st party shall pay Rs.4,00,000 (Rupees Four Lakhs only) to the 2^nd party after closing the cases/matters before the lower Court and as well as Hon'ble High Court, and the remaining Rs.4,00,000 (Rupees Four Lakhs only) the 1^st party shall pay to the 2^nd party after mutating the name of the 1^st party in respect of the House Property.

5. Out of the above said settlement both the parties agreed to file the Memo of Compromise before the Hon'ble High Court in AS.No.528/2006 and in OS.No.248/2024 on the file of Senior Civil Judge, Devarakonda, Nalgonda District, Telangana to withdraw the above said cases.

6. Out of the above said settlement both the parties agreed not to interfere/claim in respect of the said properties each other in future also and also agreed not to claim any other properties of both the parties. 7. The 1^st Party also agreed and stated that they have no claim in respect of the property of Plot No:46 in Sy.No:1256 admeasuring 300 Sq yards situated at Shamirpet village & Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, Hyderabad and also further stated that they are not having any link docu